A federal appeals court panel raised skepticism Tuesday that President Trump’s firings of two independent agency leaders complied with Supreme Court precedent. Trump’s terminations of ...

More than 24,000 federal probationary employees who worked across 18 agencies were fired as part of President Trump's efforts to reduce the size of government.

That federal lawsuit, filed by William Norton in August of last year, alleges Norton was repeatedly bitten on his right thigh, while lying handcuffed on the ground, after Lee County deputies prompted ...

The administration said it had rehired most of the workers subject to a Maryland judge's order, but argued that doing so would "cause significant turmoil." ...

KARE 11 journalists explain how they found alarming fraudulent Medicaid billing practices at several addiction recovery centers and share reporting tips.

Donald Trump’s Department of Justice has asked a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., to replace District Court Judge James Boasberg for allegedly engaging in an “inappropriate exercise of ...

Filings in federal court in Maryland provide the fullest accounting yet of mass firings of probationary workers at 18 agencies, which were ruled illegal.

Chief Judge James Boasberg grilled a Department of Justice lawyer at a hearing Monday on the deportations of alleged Tren de ...

President Donald Trump is calling for the impeachment of a judge who ruled against his effort to swiftly deport alleged Venezuelan gang members, escalating his administration’s battle against the ...

In asking the judge to dissolve a temporary restraining order on deportation flights, the Justice Department opened another front in its aggressive pushback to his decisions.

The Trump administration in court filings has for the first time acknowledged that it fired nearly 25,000 recently hired workers, and said agencies were working to bring all of them back after a judge ...

A change in presidential administrations has resulted in the dismissal of an appeal of an injunction blocking a new interpretation of Title IX.